The Dark Side of Psychiatry Under Today's Corporatism: Prioritising Short-Term Solutions Over Long-Term Care
How Coercive Care and Standardised Treatments Harm Individuals and Benefit the Bottom Line
Psychiatry, the branch of medicine that deals with mental health disorders, has been the subject of much controversy and debate in recent years. The rise of corporatism, with its emphasis on short-term profits over long-term social welfare, has had a profound impact on the practice of psychiatry. In this article, we explore the problem with psychiatry under today's corporatism.
One of the primary issues with psychiatry under corporatism is the emphasis on short-term, quick-fix solutions to mental health issues. Rather than focusing on long-term, holistic treatments that address the root causes of mental health disorders, psychiatrists often resort to prescribing medication to treat symptoms. This approach can be effective in the short-term, but it can also create a dependence on medication and fail to address the underlying issues.
Another problem with psychiatry under corporatism is the tendency to view patients as commodities rather than individuals. This can lead to a focus on maximizing profits by providing quick, standardised care rather than personalised, compassionate treatment. Patients may feel pressured to conform to treatment plans that are designed to fit within a predetermined schedule, rather than receiving care that meets their unique needs.
In addition to these issues, the current system of psychiatric care can also be harmful to individuals who do not truly need it. Many people experience transient crisis experiences that could be healed naturally without psychiatric intervention. However, due to the prevalence of corporatism in psychiatric care, individuals may be pressured to seek treatment even if it is not truly necessary.
Furthermore, the current system of psychiatric care may also be coercive in nature. Individuals may be involuntarily committed to psychiatric facilities against their will, or coerced into treatment through the threat of losing their job, their housing, or their freedom. This can be especially problematic for vulnerable populations, such as those experiencing homelessness or poverty.
To address these issues, it is important to move away from the current model of corporatised psychiatric care and towards a more holistic, patient-centered approach. This approach should prioritise long-term, personalised care that addresses the root causes of mental health disorders rather than simply treating symptoms. Additionally, it should place a greater emphasis on voluntary and transactional therapies, rather than coercive or involuntary treatment.
In conclusion, the problem with psychiatry under today's corporatism is that it has more to do with short-term "sociopolitical detainment care" to treat one's transient crisis experience, which could be healed naturally by avoiding psychiatric intervention altogether unless truly voluntary and transactional therapies are wanted rather than "needed". By moving towards a more patient-centered approach, we can ensure that individuals receive the care they truly need, rather than being subjected to a system that prioritises profits over people.